This article was co-authored by Chris Hadley, Ph D, a trusted member of wiki How's community.
It may be tempting to simply give your paper a quick read and use the spell-checker to make edits.
However, revising your paper properly is more in-depth.
Here is an excellent comprehensive guide (think desk reference) to creating data displays for qualitative research. This appears to be a quick process, but it should not be.
After you are satisfied with your coding procedures, I suggest submitting your table to an expert for review, or perhaps even one of the participants (if interviewing) to promote validity.
There are 15 references cited in this article, which can be found at the bottom of the page. Whether you’re in a history, literature, or science class, you’ll probably have to write a research paper at some point.
It may seem daunting when you’re just starting out, but staying organized and budgeting your time can make the process a breeze.What you should have at the end of this stage are transcripts with 3-5 different colors in lots of highlighted text.Transfer these into a while re-reading the text to 1.Note how the researcher listed the major categories, then explained them after the table.This is a very effective way to organize results and/or discussion in a research paper.To examine the latter, you might ask, What conditions caused or influenced concepts and categories? or What are the associated effects or consequences?For example, if one of your concepts is , an axial code might be a phrase like “our principal encourages different teaching methods.” This discusses the context of the concept and/or categories, and suggests that you may need a new category labeled “supportive environment.” Axial coding is merely a more directed approach at looking at the data, to help make sure that you have identified all important aspects. Transfer final concepts and categories into a data table, such as this one (Aulls, 2004).The Results section of a scientific research paper represents the core findings of a study derived from the methods applied to gather and analyze information.It presents these findings in a logical sequence without bias or interpretation from the author, setting up the reader for later interpretation and evaluation in the Discussion section.Chris Hadley earned his Ph D in Cognitive Psychology from UCLA in 2006.Chris' academic research has been published in numerous scientific journals.