Tags: Pharmcas Personal StatementPower Of English Language EssayArgumentative History Essay TopicsAs Biology Coursework - Water PotentialOld Spice Commercial EssayM Tech Thesis Report On Image ProcessingLined Writing Paper For First GradersAssistant Teacher Cover LetterOutline Sample For Research PaperContraste Essay
It may strike some as surprising that legal protection of embryonic human beings can co-exist with the U. Most of these provisions prohibit experiments on embryos outside the womb.We believe that the above legally acknowledged protections against assaults on human dignity must be extended to all human beings-irrespective of gender, race, religion, health, disability, or age.Our careful consideration of these issues leads to the conclusion that human stem cell research requiring the destruction of human embryos is objectionable on legal, ethical, and scientific grounds.
Now that human embryonic stem cells can be isolated and multiplied in the laboratory, some scientists believe that treatments for a variety of diseases-such as diabetes, heart disease, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's-may be within reach.
Initially, this was because a federal regulation of 1975 prevented government funding of IVF experiments unless such experiments were deemed acceptable by an Ethics Advisory Board.
Further, it is instructive to note that the existing law which permits researchers to use fetal tissue obtained from elective abortions requires that the abortions are performed for reasons which are entirely unrelated to the research objectives.
The duty to protect human life is specifically reflected in the homicide laws of all 50 states.
The stated rationales behind this decision are that stem cells are not embryos (which itself may be a debatable point) and that research using cells obtained by destroying human embryos can be divorced from the destruction itself.