While some scientists argue that cloning will change the world into a better place, other scientists are having second thoughts whether or not it is worthwhile.
Cloning is considered possible with plants, animals and humans.
The problem with lack of genetic variability is also relevant with humans though.
If the whole population has same genetic substance, one virus can expunge the entire population.
What will that mean for normal, average humans that were not produced by cloning methods?
Cloning Essay Pros And Cons
Will that mean that normal humans will actually be considered lower level of society? And of course, the last, but nevertheless a very important argument, is the cost.Another reason why people argue on the subject of cloning humans is religious and moral beliefs.From religious point of view, cloning is defined as “messing with God” and even if it will be possible someday, clones will be soulless creatures.It creates a question whether or not cloning would be an option to all levels of society, or would the prices be so high that only a few will be able to afford it?As of today, natural way of reproductions is definitely the cheapest one.Furthermore, there is an immense difference between a woman's desire to terminate an unwanted pregnancy and the desire to create a genetic duplicate of another person.There is no inconsistency between supporting the former and opposing the latter.If you cloned yourself, the resulting child would be neither your son or daughter nor your twin brother or sister, but a new category of human being: your clone.The great majority of people have an intuitive sense that human beings should not be cloned.Most parents learn to communicate their expectations about their children in a moderate and ultimately positive way. Every medical technology carries with it a degree of risk.Cloning techniques will eventually be perfected in mammals and will then be suitable for human trials. Human society can accept or reject any proposed technology on its own merits. Reproductive cloning can provide genetically related children for people who cannot be helped by other fertility treatments (i.e., who do not produce eggs or sperm). Reproductive cloning would allow lesbians to have a child without having to use donor sperm, and gay men to have a child that does not have genes derived from an egg donor (though, of course, a surrogate would have to carry the pregnancy). Reproductive cloning could allow parents of a child who has died to seek redress for their loss. Cloning is a reproductive right, and should be allowed once it is judged to be no less safe than natural reproduction.